The major problem is the focussing itself: you can only find the focus point by moving the camera back and forth. Which probably requires a macro focussing rail like the one from Really Right Stuff. Which is - IMHO - darn expensive. :-)
The photos are not very shiny examples of composition :-) but I am simply impressed by the magnification that can be achieved with the reversed lens, so here we go:

Liverleaf flower (spring is here!) - reversed 50mm/1.8D lens, 1/4s at f/22 (the flower is about 2cm in diameter)
The liver leaf was particularly problematic because I couldn't get close enough with my tripod. I removed half of the middle column and was able to get within focus range that way. I think I spent 10 minutes or something crawling on the forest floor until I was within a range and position where both focus and light would work... :-}
Another problem is the metering - the camera simply says "f/0" because it has no aperture information. The light meter of the S5 works in manual mode, but of course I had to manually stop the lens down (and depth of field is really really thin being that close to the subject), which as a result turns the viewfinder veeeery dark. Manually stopping down means the lens must have an aperture ring, so only the older lenses can be used in a way that makes sense (that means in the Nikon world, the "G" type lenses don't make sense with a retro adaptor).

Pussy Willow - reversed 28mm/2.8 lens, 2,5s at f/22 (the whole thing is about 1cm in reality)
And then there's the shutter - at low ISO (which I prefer for quality reasons) the times are really long because you need to stop down the lens as much as possible for sufficient DOF. I used the self timer for these shots, but manual mirror prerelease (M'up) and a cable release would have been ideal.

1 Euro coin - reversed 28mm/2.8 lens, 6s at f/5.6 (indoor, artificial light)
I have to admit that I never understood the fascination of macro photography (all these insects and other creepy stuff - brrrr!), but at these magnification rates its quite appealing (the "wow!" factor). I read about the retro adaptor in the "Audubon Society Guide to Nature Photography" by Tim Fitzharris first (I mentioned that book previously), and its a nice - and very cheap! - first step into macro photography.
I have a close-up + 3 filter for my 50mm lens, but of course I won't be able to get this close. Which retro adapter did you get?
ReplyDeleteThe liverleaf picture looks pretty cool with the lighting, detail and sharpness.
Hi Lisa, the retro adapter is this:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.adorama.com/NKBR2A.html
I paid something like 25€ for it.
The results you obtained, whereas you have used a ring adapter are good. It seems to me that the colors and contrast are good. But you have worked hard in post, or not more than other times? Thanks Alex, have a nice evening :-)
ReplyDeleteThis time it was only crop / white balance / sharpen... :-)
ReplyDeleteSo its nothing unusual to be done on raw files.
Huh, you got it from US? Cool, I will check it out. Thanks! :-)
ReplyDeletebellissime immagini.
ReplyDeleteThanks...Impessive results, plus the method behind the photos was helpful
ReplyDelete